Fabio Mercuri vs Giacomo Vianello Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L W W L
Form
W L W L L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Mercuri 1 - 0 Vianello
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mercuri winning 2 and Vianello winning 0. The last match between Mercuri and Vianello was at the Italy F24, 21-07-2014, Q1 round, Clay with Fabio Mercuri getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fabio Mercuri | 1 |
| Giacomo Vianello | 0 |
Italy F24(21-07-2014)
6
4
7
6
| Mercuri | Stats | Vianello |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 31 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 51% (93-91) | Career Total W/L | 25% (10-30) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fabio Mercuri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Andrea Basso
Player
Fabio Mercuri
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Fabio Mercuri
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Fabio Mercuri
Player
Nikola Cacic
82%
(
64 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
16 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Giacomo Vianello Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Brizzi
Player
Giacomo Vianello
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (93/91) | Win/Loss | 25% (10/30) |
| 52% (213/200) | Sets Win/Loss | 29% (26/63) |
| 51% (1862/1794) | Games Win/Loss | 42% (333/459) |
| 40% (10/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) |
| 52% (83/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 26% (9/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 41 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 41 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 381.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 415.5 |
| 61% (911/1502) | 1st Serve % | 48% (58/120) |
| 59% (538/911) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (37/58) |
| 48% (284/591) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (23/62) |
| 38% (53/138) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 16% (3/19) |
| 38% (562/1478) | Return Points Win % | 38% (52/136) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 51% (91/88) | Futures W/L | 27% (10/27) |
| 51% (92/181) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (10/40) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (21/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 42% (20/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 81% (106/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 70% (10/7) |
| 18% (106/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 30% (10/3) |
| 8% (78/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (30/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
